Saturday, July 24, 2010

Week 10 - Homeland Security











A little glimpse into some quick analysis and thinking on how to assess areas for security purposes. No real major hangups on this one. I was familiar enough with the area to know where to put some observation points. Running viewsheds did take a little time and I am not sure I put enough into - reduced due to speed but I understand the process a little so I think I got what I was supposed to out of the class.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Week 4 Supervised Classification



This class challenge was interesting. As always with the class, the more you know, the more you don't know. ERDAS remains a challenge but in some ways - it is getting better. I did have to jump through a few hoops for being able to post these images. My xps viewer somehow has been corrupted and I just did a complete Windows update yesterday. So screen capture on the UWF server, crop in paint, paste in illustration, export to jpg...and now I have an image at least. Or you can just go to the links for the xps files. They at least look a little crisper.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Week 3 - Georeferencing

Week 3 involved georeferencing an aerial of Pensacola to a topo. The process was very well detailed by Ms. Holtzclaw. There are certainly many factors and issues to consider and this exercise was very much the tip of the iceberg. ERDAS is becoming a little easier to manuever around in however it is still very querky. Many crashes especially when trying to make the grid lines to something other than solid. The program just didn't like that so the map isn't a masterpiece but it is done.
http://students.uwf.edu/mpm18/remot_sensing/mod3.xps

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Mod 2 Spectral Bands Basics

The assignment this week was to learn about the spectral band combinations and how changing these helps to identify various features on an image, how to interpret the layer info and use this information. There is a lot to an image and knowing a little about the background info is important. I enjoyed this exercise and am getting a little used to ERDAS as well.
Module 2 Map 1 - Identify Water
Module 2 Map 2 - Identify Glaciers
Module 2 Map 3 - Shallow Water

Monday, June 28, 2010

Mod 1 Beginning ERDAS

Here is my map for Mod 1. ERDAS instructions leave a lot to be desired. I am not sure their reasoning is on the vagueness of the "how to", perhaps it's to get more to take their classes or perhaps it's to challenge us.
http://students.uwf.edu/mpm18/remot_sensing/mod1.xps

Monday, April 26, 2010

GIS 3015 Cartography Final Project


Caption:

2009 ACT participation rates and composite scores averaged per state. Rates and scores are based on tests taken by students who were slated to graduate in 2009. The national participation rate was 75%. The average national composite score was 21.1. A perfect composite score is 36.

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Mod 11 Google Earth


For week 11’s module – we were tasked with selecting a potential site for a wind farm in the Great Lakes area. After reviewing maps for average wind speed and potential wind power areas, I chose to focus on the “thumb” of Michigan. The location I found is within a few miles of the coast of Saginaw Bay off Lake Huron. It appears to be around 2000 acres of a currently existing and operating quarry. I researched the following criteria/concerns regarding wind farms:
Wind Speed – towers seem to be between 250-300 feet in height or approximately 80 meters. According to one site – the average wind speed for 70 meters in that vicinity is 15-17 mph. This is more than adequate to power the turbines.
Ornithology – several bird migration routes cross this area with waterfowl being the largest. Reports I read indicated they could not find any real issues with wind farms and bird migration routes. I imagine this might change depending on the density of the wind turbines. The current use of a quarry versus an agricultural use might also be a positive factor in locating a wind farm here.
Noise/Shadow Flicker – there are conflicting reports on the level of noise that wind turbines make but again – located in an area that has a large use of heavy equipment – noise should not be a huge factor. There did appear to be some dwellings surrounding the area but again, the area is large enough to space the turbines away from homes both for the potential noise factor and the shadow flicker.
Shipping Impact – I could not see where there were any large shipping vessel routes into Saginaw Bay so this should not be a concern. Wind farms have been know to create “noise” in radar but the technology is getting better as well as the location again isn’t near any larger shipping channels.
Landscape/Visual Impact – the current use of the property already has impacted the view and landscape. The quarry has been in operation since the 1890’s so everyone should be used to the area not being visually appealing .
Access/Need – due to the current use – access into the property should be fairly easy and there is a small town within a few miles from the quarry that could potentially make use of the newly created power source.
I feel an area that could potentially be ending it’s current use and is possibly at least in part under transition could benefit from a new use. There are already at least 2 wind farms currently operating in that part of Michigan so viability seems to be high.